A discussion on the future of nuclear energy

Access Denied

The cost issue has contributed to the major slowdown in the construction of new plants in the U. By most measures nuclear power is among the safest forms of energy ever devised.

China, though building rapidly, drew less than 3 percent of its power from nuclear in John Deutch co-chairErnest Moniz co-chairS. This varies sharply by country — in the U. Today, fossil fuel—based power generation and transportation systems are major contributors to the all-time-high levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide.

The Nuclear Energy Institute, which represents plant owners, builders, designers, suppliers and related companies, notes that in the U.

Are other energy sources sufficient to wean us from fossil fuels? This has been dramatically illustrated with the falling costs of wind and solar power. Peg Skorpinski Ina reactor at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania had a partial meltdown because of valve failure and human operator error, resulting in the evacuation ofpeople.

In Septembera South Carolina effort to build two new reactors at an existing plant was delayed for three years. Nuclear fission is uniquely positioned to help meet this challenge because it has the highest energy density of any power source and its growth potential is not limited by resource availability.

An accident at a light-water reactor can release radioactive materials as fine particles. An MIT team is conducting technology assessments, economic modeling, and analyses of the regulatory, financial, and political aspects of siting, designing, constructing, operating, and decommissioning nuclear facilities.

Despite a turbulent history, the allure of nuclear energy—electricity production on a massive scale with minimal emissions—remains attractive. An interdisciplinary MIT faculty group decided to study the future of nuclear power because of a belief that this technology is an important option for the United States and the world to meet future energy needs without emitting carbon dioxide and other atmospheric pollutants.

And within that debate, nothing seems to produce such starkly opposing viewpoints as nuclear energy. Members of the Advisory Committee included: This puts you in a position to design reactor vessels to have limited service life, to be replaced multiple times during a life of a plant," Peterson says.

Noah Berger "One of the reasons it makes sense to have this bootcamp at Berkeley," says Todd Allen, a nuclear energy expert and senior visiting fellow at Third Way, "is because there is a culture of innovation. While the costs for wind and solar have been decreasing, the ticket for a nuclear plant has ballooned.

Anything that is perceived as clean is going up. Billions and Billions When it comes to any energy source, it is cost that sits at the root of the discussion. Inthe Atomic Energy Commission estimated that the nation would be powered by thousands of nuclear reactors by the year Nov.

13, The Center on Global Energy Policy at the School of International and Public Affairs of Columbia University presented a panel discussion on the future of nuclear power on November 8, In order to meet our nation's future electricity demands, we must include nuclear power in the energy discussion.

Join the debate on Facebook. Follow U.S. News Debate Club on Twitter. The future of nuclear energy Energy's Blue-Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future inPeterson also contributes to the national discussion about new nuclear regulatory standards.

The future of nuclear energy

Nuclear power is a Rorschach test: You see what you want to see — a rosy nuclear future or an old-world dinosaur in a slow death spiral — reflecting your own views on the energy present and.

The Future of Nuclear Energy In “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy” (6/23), Kristin Shrader-Frechette outlined objections to an increased reliance on nuclear energy to meet the nation’s energy.


Nuclear Innovation: Clean Energy Future. Nuclear Innovation: Clean Energy Future (NICE Future) is a new international initiative launched under the Clean Energy Ministerial in May 34%.

This discussion was hosted by ClearPath, Third Way, and Energy for Humanity.

A discussion on the future of nuclear energy
Rated 3/5 based on 68 review