Butterfield found the Whig interpretation of history objectionable, because it warps the past to see it in terms of the issues of the present and attempts to squeeze the contending forces of the past into a form that reminds us of ourselves.
What concerns him most are the incremental mental transitions that propelled scientific investigation to the next step.
Change, it seems, came slowly. The Scientific Revolution remains very much alive as a research problem, or, at least, a set of problems. History is not the study of origins; rather it is the analysis of all the mediations by which the past was turned into our present".
Butterfield served as editor of the Cambridge Historical Journal from to and was knighted in Hatch An earlier and shorter version of this brief historiographic essay was published in the OAH Magazine of History, 4, 2 Christianson has written In The Present of the Creator: Butterfield wrote that "Whiggishness" is too handy a "rule of thumb She is at the service of good causes and bad.
Scientists could now discover and demonstrate advances based on experimentation.
First to trace traditional themes in the historiography of the Scientific Revolution by means of a bibliographic essay; and second, to identify new and emerging areas of research by suggesting trends in recent publication.
The greatest menace to our civilization is the conflict between giant organized systems of self-righteousness - each only too delighted to find that the other is wicked - each only too glad that the sins of the other give it pretext for still deeper hatred.
To be sure, there are difficulties with any periodization. Biography[ edit ] Butterfield was born in Oxenhope in Yorkshire and was raised a devout Methodistwhich he remained for life.
Vickers considers the book a late example of the earliest stage of modern analysis of the history of Renaissance magic in relation to the development of science, when magic was largely dismissed as being "entertaining but irrelevant".
The literature on Galileo and Newton is staggering in scope and complexity. Butterfield was a fellow at Cambridge from —79 and in the s, he was a fellow of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey.
But where to begin? After the advance a period of coalescing is required before yet another advance can be made. At the height of the Cold Warhe warned that conflicts between self-righteous value systems could be catastrophic: To demonstrate this struggle, he describes how Copernicus struggled with his own conservatism.
However, Butterfield does not seem to contradict the idea that the past may offer some use, perhaps through exposing human nature or the power of chance?Sir Herbert Butterfield, historian, was born in Oxenhope, Yorkshire, on 7 October His father, Albert Butterfield, was forced to leave school at the age of ten because of his own father’s premature death, and had been unable to fulfil his desire to train for the Methodist ministry.
Instead, he was employed as a clerk (later chief clerk) in a. HISTORY OF SCIENCE: ORIGINS TO NEWTON Dr Robert Alan HATCH n this course we survey changes and developments in European science (natural philosophy) from earliest times through the Scientific Revolution of the 17th century.
The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science. Herbert Butterfield, The Origins of Modern.
Get this from a library! The origins of modern science: [Herbert Butterfield]. Of all published articles, the following were the most read within the past 12 months. Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences, Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences, The History of Medicine and the Scientific Revolution.
Buy The Origins of Modern Science Revised by Herbert Butterfield (ISBN: ) from Amazon's Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on /5.Download